Microsoft September 2011 Black Tuesday
Since we usually have a larger visitor base on Black Tuesday than normal just this reminder for those that might have missed the fun this month.
Microsoft already leaked the bulletins on Friday for about an hour or so, and we already published the overview at that time. Anyway, we'll look into changes they might have done since last week and update them here if we find anything worthwhile.
--
Swa Frantzen -- Section 66
GlobalSign back in operation
Fellow handler Lenny wrote about GlobalSign being named by a hacker claiming the DigiNotar and Comodo breaches and GlobalSign's response to it by stopping the processes of issuing certificates.
Today GlobalSign should be back in operation and they have kept a public track of their incident response. I suggest to read it bottom up as that way you get the timeline.
I see a number of very good ideas and actions in there. First off they stopped issuing certificates right after the claim, that's the containment you see in action: make sure it does not get worse. In fact if you look back at what's known so far of the DigiNotar case, had DigiNotar done that on June 19th when they detected the breach the first time, and then would have done a complete technical audit of their systems, DigiNotar would today not have had their entire reputation thrown away. Next GlobalSign contracted Fox-IT, the same company that has been/is analyzing the systems of DigiNotar. The value of having somebody who's been dealing with similar incidents can more often than not proof to be invaluable.
I also see one worrying issue, and that's that their web server (the one serving www.globalsign.com) has signs it has been breached. GlobalSign claims it has always been isolated though.
Over the past few weeks we've had a number of request of GlobalSign customers that were wondering if they should migrate to other providers.
Let's analyze with what we know now:
- There is the anonymous claim of a hacker that he's hacked Comodo, Diginotar, GlobalSign and 3 more unnamed CAs.
- The hacker gives as proof a calc.exe signed by the by now well known rogue *.google.com certificate from the DigiNotar breach. It does proof somebody has the secret key that goes with the certificate, but it doesn't proof he's the one doing it all.
- From what we publicly can see, GlobalSign is reacting properly to it all.
- If you would change providers you risk changing to one of the 3 unnamed ones.
So what's smart to do ?
- Be ready to switch to another provider if you need to. Being ready can be done to different levels, but one can start with selecting (or setting up criteria), etc. This would be needed in two cases:
- your current provider looses trust from the world at large (what DigiNotar did), or
- your current provider sees itself compromised badly enough that it revokes its own intermediate certificates (what DigiNotar should have done) while it stopped issuing new certificates.
- If I were a GlobalSign customer, I would not migrate away from GlobalSign as it risks I'd end up with one of the 3 unnamed ones and be in a worse condition than I'm now.
--
Swa Frantzen --
Adobe September 2011 Black Tuesday overview
Adobe has released 1 bulletin today.
This updates Adobe products to the following versions:
- Adobe Reader and Acrobat
- 10.1.1
- 9.4.6
- 8.3.1 (version 8.x will soon see its support terminated)
# | Affected | Known Exploits | Adobe rating |
---|---|---|---|
APSB11-24 | Multiple vulnerabilities in the adobe reader and adobe acrobat software allow privilege escalation (windows only) or random code execution. | ||
Reader & Acrobat CVE-2011-1352 CVE-2011-2431 CVE-2011-2432 CVE-2011-2433 CVE-2011-2434 CVE-2011-2435 CVE-2011-2436 CVE-2011-2437 CVE-2011-2438 CVE-2011-2439 CVE-2011-2440 CVE-2011-2441 CVE-2011-2442 |
TBD | Critical |
--
Swa Frantzen -- Section 66
More DigiNotar intermediate certificates blocklisted at Microsoft
Microsoft issued yet another update to remove trust in the cross signed intermediate certificates of DigiNotar.
- http://blogs.technet.com/b/msrc/archive/2011/09/13/more-on-diginotar-certificates-and-september-bulletins.aspx
- http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/advisory/2607712
- http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2616676
--
Swa Frantzen -- Section 66
Comments
Anonymous
Dec 3rd 2022
9 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 3rd 2022
9 months ago
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
https://defineprogramming.com/
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
distribute malware. Even if the URL listed on the ad shows a legitimate website, subsequent ad traffic can easily lead to a fake page. Different types of malware are distributed in this manner. I've seen IcedID (Bokbot), Gozi/ISFB, and various information stealers distributed through fake software websites that were provided through Google ad traffic. I submitted malicious files from this example to VirusTotal and found a low rate of detection, with some files not showing as malware at all. Additionally, domains associated with this infection frequently change. That might make it hard to detect.
https://clickercounter.org/
https://defineprogramming.com/
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
rthrth
Jan 2nd 2023
8 months ago