|Usually it is not a big issue to name a computer after the user. It can be an issue if the computer is used outside of your LAN (e.g. a Laptop). The computer may advertise it's name on the local network, and if this is an untrusted network (e.g. hotel wifi), then others can spot whose' computer it is.||
Jun 29th 2015
1 year ago
I would say this needlessly gives up information, sure usernames are not generally a secret, but why make the information gathering process that bit easier, by giving up the host name and username conventions as well as pairing users to devices? The same goes for naming conventions that give up clues to the services running on them...why freely offer this information up so easily. For example, if a print server is called PRN01 or licence server is called LIC03.|
I suppose the the other side of the coin is that predictable and understandable naming conventions makes administration that bit easier and the information is easily discoverable anyway.
Aug 12th 2015
1 year ago