Odd Vanishing Signatures in OS X XProtect

Published: 2012-02-27
Last Updated: 2012-02-28 07:28:59 UTC
by Johannes Ullrich (Version: 1)
4 comment(s)

With OS X Snow Leopard, Apple for the first time introduced its own anti malware technology, XProtect. Ever since then, Apple has been pushing new signatures, and XProtect itself has undergone some subtle changes allowing it to pull signature updates more frequently. The list of signatures is still rather small, but unlike other OS X anti virus software, which covers Windows malware as well as OS X malware, XProtect only covers OS X malware. At this point, two larger "families" of OS X malware emerged: The fake anti virus software MacDefender and the malicious "flash updater" Flashback.

Ever since late last year, I am running a cron job on one of my Macs to watch for XProtect updates. The updates are delivered "silently", but the cron job keeps monitoring the definition file and keeps a copy of each version.

 

Ever since late last year, I am running a cron job on one of my Macs to watch for XProtect updates. The updates are delivered "silently", but the cron job keeps monitoring the definition file and keeps a copy of each version.

When reviewing the files yesterday, I found an odd behavior: On February 4th, the file "shrunk" by almost half. Instead of 15 signatures, the file contained only 6. On February 7th, the file went back to its old size. Has anybody else seen this? You can find the file in /System/Library/CoreServices/CoreTypes.bundle /Contents/Resources/XProtect.plist . It is a readable XML file. The current size of my file is 32516 Bytes.

 

 

------

Johannes B. Ullrich, Ph.D.
SANS Technology Institute
Twitter

Keywords: apple os x protect
4 comment(s)
ISC StormCast for Monday, February 27th 2012 http://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.html?id=2353

Comments

What's this all about ..?
password reveal .
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure:

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
https://thehomestore.com.pk/
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
https://defineprogramming.com/
https://defineprogramming.com/
Enter comment here... a fake TeamViewer page, and that page led to a different type of malware. This week's infection involved a downloaded JavaScript (.js) file that led to Microsoft Installer packages (.msi files) containing other script that used free or open source programs.
distribute malware. Even if the URL listed on the ad shows a legitimate website, subsequent ad traffic can easily lead to a fake page. Different types of malware are distributed in this manner. I've seen IcedID (Bokbot), Gozi/ISFB, and various information stealers distributed through fake software websites that were provided through Google ad traffic. I submitted malicious files from this example to VirusTotal and found a low rate of detection, with some files not showing as malware at all. Additionally, domains associated with this infection frequently change. That might make it hard to detect.
https://clickercounter.org/
Enter corthrthmment here...

Diary Archives